Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jacob Fearnley vs Charles Broom Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fearnley vs Broom analysis and find out who is favored!
Jacob Fearnley vs Charles Broom Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fearnley 2 - 2 Broom
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fearnley has won 51.48% of points on their second serve, while Broom has won 50.94%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fearnley, in recent form, has won 59.35% of their opponent's second serve points, while Broom has won 54.95%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.78% and 31.66% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fearnley has saved 67.69% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Broom has saved 64.06% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fearnley has won 86.11% of matches played (W/L 31/ 5), with Broom winning 62.07% (W/L 54/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fearnley has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 86% (W/L 25/ 4), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 70% (W/L 7/ 3). Broom has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 44/ 22), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 52/ 36).
- Player level: In the last year, Fearnley has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 85.71% of matches (W/L 24/ 4), where as Broom has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.89% of matches (W/L 31/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Fearnley winning 2 times and Broom being victorious 2 times. They have played 11 sets in total, with Fearnley winning 6 and Broom winning 5. The last match between Fearnley and Broom was at the Nottingham 2 Challenger, 16-06-2024, Final, Grass with Jacob Fearnley getting the victory 4-6 6-4 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:44:21.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fearnley and Broom have played a deciding set 3 times, with Fearnley winning 1 times and Broom 2 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Fearnley winning 0, and Broom 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fearnley has played against opponents with an average rank of 258.56 while Broom has played against players with an average rank of 227.93.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fearnley has won 78% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Broom has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fearnley has converted 44.6% of breakpoint opportunities, and Broom has converted 37.27% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
271
Rank
271
High
22
Age
Plays
2
Total2
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
1
Grass2
245
Rank
235
High
26
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
79% (42-11)
Career Total W/L
64% (214-123)
94% (15-1)
YTD W/L
63% (29-17)
$0
Career Prize Money
$36,000
2
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Jacob Fearnley vs Charles Broom For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Fearnley VS Broom
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Jacob Fearnley | Charles Broom |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 6 | 5 |
| Games Won | 50 | 51 |
| Aces (Total) | 35 | 26 |
| DFs Total | 18 | 18 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:21 | 1:44:21 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (177/307) | 57% (192/337) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (137/177) | 71% (136/192) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (61/130) | 52% (76/145) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 29% (10/35) | 43% (10/23) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (125/337) | 36% (109/307) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (2/4) | 50% (2/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 50% (2/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Charles Broom
58%
(
65 of
112)
1st Serve %
66%
(
62 of
94)
10
Aces
11
8
Double Faults
4
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
44 of
62)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
41 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
94)
108
Total Points Won
98
|
||||
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Charles Broom
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
97%
(
29 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
| 6-4 4-6 6-3 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Jacob Fearnley
54%
(
50 of
93)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
8
Aces
10
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
36 of
43)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
29 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
22 of
71)
86
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
| 4-6 6-0 6-3 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Jacob Fearnley
51%
(
44 of
87)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
76)
5
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
60%
(
26 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
91
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jacob Fearnley | Charles Broom |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 100% (15/0) | 63% (29/17) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 88% (30/4) | 59% (67/46) |
| Games Win/Loss | 63% (201/116) | 52% (570/520) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (14/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (8/0) | 54% (7/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 100% (7/0) | 67% (8/4) |
| Aces pg | 0.59 | 0.56 |
| Aces Total | 92 | 299 |
| DFs per game | 0.47 | 0.21 |
| DFs Total | 73 | 112 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:23 | 1:52:30 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 357.27 | 216.74 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (613/984) | 64% (2177/3406) |
| 1st Serve W% | 77% (474/613) | 71% (1550/2177) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (191/371) | 51% (626/1229) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (62/139) | 37% (142/381) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (473/1040) | 40% (1496/3700) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 100% (7/0) | 57% (13/10) |
| Futures W/L | 100% (8/0) | 71% (15/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (15/15) | 63% (29/46) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 63% (10/16) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (4/4) | 57% (12/21) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (12/12) | 79% (28/22) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (12/0) | 21% (28/6) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (3/3) | 39% (18/7) |
Jacob Fearnley Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Mattia Bellucci
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
74%
(
34 of
46)
6
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Charles Broom
58%
(
65 of
112)
1st Serve %
66%
(
62 of
94)
10
Aces
11
8
Double Faults
4
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
44 of
62)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
41 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
94)
108
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Juncheng Shang
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
70%
(
50 of
71)
7
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
84%
(
42 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
23 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
83
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Paul Jubb
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
91)
9
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
3
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
28 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
103
Total Points Won
85
|
6-1 6-7(14) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Bu Yunchaokete
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Mark Lajal
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Clement Chidekh
74%
(
70 of
94)
1st Serve %
68%
(
67 of
99)
9
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
10
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
44 of
67)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
38%
(
36 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
99)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Federico Iannaccone
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
77)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Charles Broom Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
James McCabe
Player
Charles Broom
65%
(
87 of
133)
1st Serve %
64%
(
84 of
131)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
9
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
58 of
84)
59%
(
27 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
48 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
49 of
131)
134
Total Points Won
130
|
6-7(1) 7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Francisco Comesana
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
68%
(
76 of
112)
1
Aces
16
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
51 of
76)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
112)
99
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zachary Svajda
Player
Charles Broom
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
4
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
2
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Mikhail Kukushkin
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
60 of
86)
11
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Billy Harris
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
3
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Charles Broom
58%
(
65 of
112)
1st Serve %
66%
(
62 of
94)
10
Aces
11
8
Double Faults
4
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
44 of
62)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
41 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
94)
108
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Daniel Evans
57%
(
48 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
13
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
26 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
81)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Lloyd Harris
58%
(
66 of
113)
1st Serve %
56%
(
49 of
87)
8
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
39%
(
44 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
101
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(2) 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Shintaro Mochizuki
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
110)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
44 of
68)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
36 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
110)
111
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(9) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Blake Ellis
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
8
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
5
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Fearnley Vs Broom Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Fearnley are available here and Broom photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
